Legal Opinion

Belin v. Mitchel

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 17, 1996No. 96-2171PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOANOS, Judge.

The petition for certiorari is granted. The trial court entered an order granting respondents’ motion for summary judgment; however, that order contained none of the necessary language of finality. See, e.g., Amelco Investment Corp. v. Bryant Electric Co., 487 So.2d 386 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). No final judgment was ever entered. See, e.g., Nolan’s Towing and Recovery v. Marino Trucking, Inc., 581 So.2d 644 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); BCH Mechanical Inc. v. McCoy, 584 So.2d 1067 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); and Arcangeli v. Albertson’s, Inc., 550 So.2d 557 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989), cited in Dixon v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arcangeli v. Albertson's, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. Dixon v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Nolan's Towing and Recovery v. Marino Trucking, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. BCH Mechanical, Inc. v. McCoyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. Amelco Investment Corp. v. Bryant Electric Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mercy Hospital v. HolmesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API