Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Pullman Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Blair County

Decided December 29, 1927No. 11Published

1Opinion of the Court

Hare, P. J.,

In the affidavit of defense filed, the defendant insists that the plaintiff is not entitled to have his cause submitted to a jury, because (1) the statement of claim does not contain any averments of fact convicting the defendant of negligence, requiring it to respond in damages; *439and (2) under his own averments, the plaintiff is barred by his contributory negligence.

The object of the suit is to recover the value of certain property alleged to have been stolen from the plaintiff while a passenger on a Pullman sleeping-car. According to the statement, the plaintiff was a passenger…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Springer v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. American Steamship Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API