Legal Opinion

Nix v. Texas Pacific Railway Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1891No. 3206PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Erkok from Harrison. Tried below before Hon. A. J. Booty. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

COLLARD, Judge,

Section A.—This suit was brought in the District Court of Harrison County by John A. Six, plaintiff in error, to recover of defendant in error, the Texas & Pacific Eailway Company, actual damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused under the following circumstances:

Plaintiff and one Eapp were both in the employ of defendant, drilling a well for defendant at Sierra Blanco, Eapp as assistant foreman and plaintiff working under him as engineer, Eapp being in charge of the work and having power to employ and discharge hands engaged about the same. Plaintiff and Eapp…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Taylor v. EidsonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Douglas v. Texas Mexican R'y Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. CarlinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1901
  2. Lantry-Sharpe Contracting Co. v. McCrackenTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Sweeney v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Maughmer v. BehringCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  5. Tullos v. Texas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API