Abad v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1DissentJones, Chief Judge
In a case with an identical fact situation, this court has already decided that section 208, supra, applies only to members of the Fleet Reserve who had completed more than 16 years of active service when they transferred to the Reserve and not to those who transferred with exactly 16 years’ service. Liberty v. United States, 120 C. Cls. 274.
The majority holds that Congress could not have meant one rate of retirement pay for those who have exactly 16 years of service and another rate for those who have had 16 years and 1 day, for example. However, enlistments, as *410well as reenlistments, in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leonard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
- Third Scottish American Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941
- Lambert v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
- Liberty v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1917