Mead v. Raymond
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ingham. (Gridley, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, C. J.
This suit was instituted by the voluntary appearance of Mead and Raymond before a justice of the peace, pursuant to the statute. ,,Comp. L. § 5258. [How. Stat. § 6823.] A formal declaration with two counts was immediately filed, to which the defendant pleaded the general issue. The cause of action was a false warranty, and the action was in tort. The declaration described the sale of a horse by defendant to the plaintiff, and averred that the defendant falsely warranted that the horse was sound. The form of action is familiar. Carter v Glass 44 Mich. 154, and cases; Humiston v. Smith 22 Conn.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- House v. FortIndiana Supreme Court · 1837
- Cutler v. CoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1828
- Carter v. GlassMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Cooper v. LandonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Humiston v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mellwood Distilling Co. v. HarperU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1908
- Nellis v. Pennock Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1889
- O'Connell v. SchwanabeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1889