Legal Opinion

Verlander v. Patel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 3, 1986No. A14-86-067-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURPHY, Justice.

Brenda Verlander, a real estate broker, appeals from a summary judgment entered against her in a suit to recover a real estate commission. In four points of error, appellant complains the trial court erred in granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment because of the existence of a genuine issue of material fact. We agree and reverse.

A detailed statement of the events leading up to the initiation of suit is a necessary predicate to consideration of the merits of appellant’s claims. On July 20, 1981, appellee Patel entered into a written contract to purchase valuable…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Wilcox v. St. Mary's University of San Antonio, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Jones v. Del Andersen and AssociatesTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Knight v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maewal v. Adventist Health Systems/Sunbelt, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. General Properties Investments, Inc. and Burt L. Joiner v. Scott Toeppich, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API