Legal Opinion
Maida v. Velella
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 9, 1987PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be modified by denying defendant Daniel George and Son Funeral Home, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment, and, as so modified, affirmed.
On October 24, 1981, plaintiffs Anthony and Anne Maida were driving their car in a funeral procession which started at the Daniel George and Son Funeral Home, Inc. (Daniel George) and was to proceed to Pine Lawn Memorial Park and Cemetery (Pine Lawn). The Maida’s vehicle was the third vehicle in a procession of eight or nine cars following a hearse driven by Daniel George, Jr., the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pulka v. EdelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Ugarriza v. SchmiederNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by6 opinions
- Union Park Memorial Chapel v. HuttSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Giantonnio v. TaccardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Tambaro v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Hutt v. NicholsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Bianchini v. Incorporated Village of NorthportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.