Legal Opinion

Interest K.S.D. v. K.S.D.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 2018No. 20170272; 20170273PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

[¶ 1] R.W.D. appeals from a juvenile court order terminating his parental rights to his two children. He argues insufficient evidence supports the termination of his parental rights. Retaining jurisdiction under N.D.R.App.P. 35(a)(3), we remanded to the juvenile court for testimony of a qualified expert witness and findings about "the prevailing social and cultural standards of the Indian child's Tribe" under 25 U.S.C. § 1912 (f) and 25 C.F.R. § 23.122 (a). Interest of K.S.D. and J.S.D. , 2017 ND 289 , ¶ 29, 904 N.W.2d 479 . The juvenile court found the State proved beyond a reasonable doubt,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gaddie v. K.S.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Interest of K.S.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API