Legal Opinion

Saulsbury v. American Vulcanized Fibre Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided June 11, 1914PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Summons Case (No. 69, March Term, 1914). Action of assumpsit by Willard Saulsbury and others against American Vulcanized Fibre Company to recover compensation for professional services rendered the defendant by the plaintiffs in instituting and conducting for the defendant certain litigation in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware.

Read the full summary

Summons Case (No. 69, March Term, 1914). Action of assumpsit by Willard Saulsbury and others against American Vulcanized Fibre Company to recover compensation for professional services rendered the defendant by the plaintiffs in instituting and conducting for the defendant certain litigation in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware. The issues of fact as well as of law were tried by the court, pursuant to the statute which permits trial in this manner when agreed to by the parties. See on error, ■—Boyce—, 95 Atl. 1078. In opening, the plaintiffs stated that their case was to be…

1Opinion of the Court

Woolley, J.,

announcing the decision of the court:

Under authority of the statute and by agreement of the parties, the matters of fact at issue in this cause were tried by the court, judgment to be rendered upon its decision thereon as upon a verdict by a jury. Const. Art. 4, § 23; Chapter 270, Vol. 11, Laws of Delaware; Rev. Code of 1893 p. 776. The case was tried, testimony offered, objections interposed, rulings made and exceptions noted in all respects similar to like proceedings in a trial by jury.

In order to preserve to the parties the same right of exception they would have had, if the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eggleston v. BoardmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Knight v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Blair v. Columbian Fireproofing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  4. Union Surety & Guaranty Co. v. TenneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Perry v. LordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Levine v. Bayne, Snell & Krause, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Pickens Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Foreman's Systems, Inc. v. Milk Dealers' Crate Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
  4. Resorts International, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
  5. Mackey v. Passaic Stone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API