Natkin Engineering Co. v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.

WIDLSON, G. J.

(after stating the case as above).

None of appellant’s assignments of error are copied in their brief. For that reason this court (in conformity to a ruling of the Supreme Court) “should [quoting] confine its consideration of the case to those fundamental errors apparent on the face of the record.” Clonts v. Johnson, 116 Tex. 489, 294, S. W. 844, 846; and see Lumber Co. v. Moore (Tex. Civ. App.) 294 S. W. 605; Shaw v. Oil Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 10 S.W.(2d) 144; and Lumbermen’s Reciprocal Ass’n v. Ryan (Tex. Civ. App.) 299 S. W. 701. As appellant has not pointed out and we have not…