Legal Opinion

United States v. Gordon

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 22, 1965No. Crim. 1115-64PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PINE, District Judge.

This is a Motion for a New Trial under Rule 33, Fed.R.Crim.P. The grounds for the motion as set forth therein are (1) that the sole Government witness against defendant at the trial was Horace Lafayette Logan, also known as Leroy Logan, Jr., (2) that on proper cross examination at trial Logan denied that he had ever been convicted of larceny, (3) that in fact Logan had been duly convicted of larceny in the District of Columbia Court of General Sessions on the 12th day of November, 1962, (4) that counsel for the defendant at trial exercised all due diligence to prove this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mesarosh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Smith v. PollinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  3. Thompson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Morris W. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  2. United States v. Edmund RosnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. People v. BellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. United States v. LipowskiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1976
  5. United States v. AtkinsonDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API