Legal Opinion

Ohio Presbyterian Homes v. Kinney

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1984No. Nos. 83-377 and 83-841PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue presented by these appeals is whether the respective appellants have demonstrated their entitlement to exemptions under R.C. 5709.12 by satisfying the requirements necessary to be categorized as a “home for the aged” as set forth in R.C. 5701.13.1 We find that neither tax*93payer complies with the strict requirements of R.C. 5701.13 and, therefore, affirm the respective decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals.

I

In case No. 83-841, we are initially faced with the question of whether appellant, Friendship Village, met the ninety-five percent requirement of R.C. 5701.13(B). Under the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Toledo Business & Professional Women's Retirement Living, Inc. v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Ohio Children's Society, Inc. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Dayton Sash & Door Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Sun Oil Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. S.E.M. Villa II, Inc. v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Board of Education of Dublin School District v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. National Church Residences of Chillicothe v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Dublin School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Toledo Jewish Home for Aged, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Board of Education of Dublin City School District v. TracyOhio Court of Appeals · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API