Legal Opinion

Hornstein v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 20, 1907No. 1,403PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HUNT, District Judge.

Charles Hornstein, plaintiff in error, was convicted of the crime of gambling after trial upon information filed in the United States Commissioner’s Court for the District of Alaska. To the information Hornstein filed a demurrer and plea in abatement, raising the point that the United States Commissioner had no jurisdiction over an offense committed within the incorporated limits of the town of Nome, District of Alaska, where the alleged crime was *778committed. The plea in abatement and demurrer were overruled, trial was then had before a jury, and a verdict of guilty was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fox v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  2. Cross v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Rosencranz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API