Legal Opinion
State v. Van Buren
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 26, 1993No. 92-KA-1249PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
WALTZER, Judge.
The defendant was charged with simple burglary of an inhabited dwelling, LSA-R.S. 14:62.2. He filed a motion to suppress evidence, which was granted, and a motion to suppress identification, which was denied. He took writs to this Court seeking review of the denial of his motion to suppress the identification, but this Court denied writs on March 12, 1992, finding that the relator had an adequate remedy on appeal. State v. Van Buren, unpub. (92-K-0503, La.App. 4th Cir., March 12, 1992). A twelve member jury found the defendant guilty as charged, and he was originally sentenced…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. CrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. CarterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001