Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sampson v. Barber Salvage Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 1980Published

1Dissent

Schnepp and Callahan, JJ. (dissenting).

We respectfully dissent. In our view, Special Term improvidently exercised its discretion in denying plaintiff’s application for leave to serve an amended bill of particulars. Leave to serve an *978amended bill of particulars should be freely granted (CPLR 3025, subd [b]). While CPLR 3025 (subd [b]) does not expressly apply to a bill of particulars, the standard used to decide a motion for leave to amend a bill of particulars appears to be akin to that under CPLR 3025 (subd [b]) for amended pleadings. Therefore, in the absence of a showing that prejudice…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gardner v. Fyr-Fyter Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Palmer v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  3. Frank Fahey v. County of OntarioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API