Legal Opinion

State v. Sondreal

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1990No. 16903PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice.

In this decision we affirm convictions of distribution of a controlled substance and conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance, holding that (1) cocaine is, as a matter of law, a controlled substance; (2) conflicts in State’s evidence do not warrant reversal; (3) there was adequate corroboration of an accomplice’s testimony; and (4) subsequent return of a controlled substance to the original deliverer may be a distribution thereof under our statute.

FACTS

Kip Sondreal was indicted on one count of conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance in violation of SDCL 22-3-81…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. ReutterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. JennerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. Shank & BradleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. DornbuschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. PellegrinoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. DaviSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. HageSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. SprikSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API