State v. Sondreal
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Justice.
In this decision we affirm convictions of distribution of a controlled substance and conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance, holding that (1) cocaine is, as a matter of law, a controlled substance; (2) conflicts in State’s evidence do not warrant reversal; (3) there was adequate corroboration of an accomplice’s testimony; and (4) subsequent return of a controlled substance to the original deliverer may be a distribution thereof under our statute.
FACTS
Kip Sondreal was indicted on one count of conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance in violation of SDCL 22-3-81…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. ReutterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. JennerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. Shank & BradleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. DornbuschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. PellegrinoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. DaviSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. HageSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. SprikSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.