Simpson v. State

CARR, Presiding Judge.

In the court below the accused was convicted for a violation of a phase of our prohibition law.

Appellant presses several positions on which he relies for a reversal of the judgment below. We will respond to two of these. The others will not likely reoccur in the event of another trial.

Appellant’s attorney made the following exceptions to the court’s oral charge:

“The defendant excepts to that portion of the Court’s oral charge as follows: There has been a lot said in the argument about a search warrant. I am going to charge you as a matter of law that this search warrant…