Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Casalinuovo

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1995No. 92-2529Published

1Opinion of the Court

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing by respondent, John Anthony Casalinuovo, of an application for termination of probation.

The court coming now to consider its order of June 16, 1993, in which respondent was suspended from the practice of law for two years with the suspension stayed and respondent placed on probation for two years on conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(9).

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED by the court, effective July 24,1995, that the probation of John Anthony Casalinuovo,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. CasalinuovoOhio Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API