Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Cassidy

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 6, 1946No. A-10771PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, P. J.

This original proceeding in habeas corpus was instituted by the petitioner John Cassidy to secure his release from confinement in the State Penitentia-

The petition for a writ of habeas corpus was prepared by the petitioner himself. It consisted mainly of conclusions of law, but after a consideration of the same and because of our desire to liberally construe any petition for a writ of habeas corpus in order to determine whether a person may be illegally confined, a rule to show cause was issued and a response has been filed on behalf of the warden by the Attorney General.

After the response of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte VanderburgCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. Ex Parte WrightCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. In Re GableCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Ex Parte CameronCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. In Re KnightCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Ex Parte ColeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Ex Parte FisherCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. Lindsey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
  5. Application of SimpsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API