Legal Opinion · Dissent

Moallen v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 7, 1985No. 01-83-0004-CRPublished

1DissentLevy, Justice

At the risk of incurring the charge of being intractable, or uneducable, I adhere substantially to the views expressed in this Court’s earlier Moallen opinion, Moallen v. State, 661 S.W.2d 204 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1983), and will attempt another and, hopefully, more persuasive formulation.

Omitting the formal portions, the indictment charged, in pertinent part:

that Maryam Moallen ... did then and there unlawfully and with intent to obtain property and service, use a fictitious Southwestern Bell Telephone Company credit card, purporting to be issued by Southwestern Bell Telephone…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. McManus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Drumm v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Haecker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Gorman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API