State ex rel. Lynch v. Rhodes
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Taft, O. J.
From the amended petition and answer thereto, it appears without dispute that relator is a citizen and taxpayer of Oído; that respondents, who are the Governor, the Auditor of State, the Secretary of State, the Treasurer of State and the Attorney General, are the Board of Commissioners of the Sinking Fund; that, on February 14, 1964 and pursuant to an agreement with the Director of Highways, the commissioners sold certificates of obligation, $25 million face value, to Saloman Brothers and Hutzler of New York City for $25,000,627.50 plus accrued interest; and that said certificates…
Also in this document: Concurrence · SchNeideR; Concurrence · SchNeideb.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Parkersburg v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Logan County National Bank v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Kaufman Construction Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Clark v. BeverSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- State Ex Rel. Public Institutional Building Authority v. GriffithOhio Supreme Court · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State ex rel. Ohio Funds Management Board v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1990