Legal Opinion

Hudson View II Associates v. Miller

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Franklin R. Weissberg, J.

*279The plaintiffs have moved, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), to dismiss the six counterclaims and two cross claims raised by the defendant Phillip D. Miller in his answer. They also seek attorney’s fees, costs and sanctions against Mr. Miller.

This is an action seeking damages for attorney misconduct. The two plaintiffs are limited partnerships. In December 1990, they each brought an action against defendant Wilfred George Gooden in which they alleged that Mr. Gooden had breached his fiduciary duties as a general partner by unlawfully converting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Curiano v. SuozziNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Dillon v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. First Nationwide Bank, Inc. v. FelbermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. HEISKELL Et Al. v. ROBERTSSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API