Legal Opinion
Shultz v. Moore
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio
Decided December 15, 1838PublishedCited by 1 opinion
[This was an action of ejectment by the lessee of Conrad Shultz against Lewis Moore. Heard on motion for a continuance.]
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF
THE COURT.
Whe're the leading counsel in a case is prevented from attending the court by sickness, and the counsel in attendance is not prepared to go on with the trial, it is a sufficient ground for a continuance. The cause stands continued at the costs of the defendant. •
2Cited by1 opinion
- Markson v. IdeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883