Legal Opinion · Dissent

Templeton v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1992No. 71783Published

1DissentJustice Bilandic

I respectfully dissent because, in my opinion, under the facts of this case, the Federal Railroad Administration (Railroad Administration) has preempted the application of the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) “fall-protection” regulations.

As the majority correctly notes, the Railroad Administration is the primary agency responsible for regulating the railroad industry. Congress enacted the Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970 (45 U.S.C. §421 et seq. (1970)) for the purpose of providing “comprehensive and uniform safety regulations in all areas of railroad…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bowman v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Albert Ralph Velasquez v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  3. Chicago Transit Authority, a Corporation v. Bruce M. Flohr, Deputy Federal Railroad Administrator and Brockman Adams, Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  4. Colt Industries, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  5. Drew v. LawrimoreDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API