Legal Opinion

United States v. Talamantes

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 3, 2010No. 10-1212PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Carlos Talamantes pleaded guilty to unlawful reentry after removal following an aggravated felony conviction in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). The plea agreement recited the parties’ belief “that a sixteen (16) level increase is applicable” under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A) due to his prior felony drug conviction, and that Talamantes would seek a downward departure or variance. Adopting without objection the recommendations of the Presentence Investigation Report, the district court 1 determined a total offense level of 21 and a criminal history category of VI, resulting in an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. FeemsterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  3. Spears v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. United States v. BarronCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. ShulerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. BoneshirtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. James MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. IbanezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. Milton GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API