Legal Opinion

United Fuel Gas Co. v. Hieneman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 12, 1954PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOREMEN, Judge.

This action was instituted by appellant to condemn a right of way 260 feet in length, comprising 0.53 acres, across a part of appellees’ 3 acre tract of land in Green-up County for a pipe line easement, the right of way for another portion of which was involved in United Fuel Gas Co. v. Mauk. The opinion in that case- was- rendered today and will be reported in 272 S.W.2d 810.

The facts are essentially the same.. -The questions involved in this case are also the same except here we have two additional points which were not raised in the Mauk case. For the reasons expressed in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United Fuel Gas Company v. MaukCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
  2. Commonwealth v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953
  3. Deborde, Administrator v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  4. Royal Adjustment Co. v. Union National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  5. United Fuel Gas Co. v. CriderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United Fuel Gas Co. v. MaukCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1957
  2. Freepartner v. RutledgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966
  3. United Fuel Gas Co. v. HienemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954
  4. United Fuel Gas Co. v. CriderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954
  5. Commonwealth, Department of Finance, ex rel. Department of Fish & Wildlife Resources v. DayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API