Legal Opinion

Farrer v. Piecuch

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

This action is brought to permanently restrain the defendants from trespassing upon certain real property to which the plaintiffs claim to be entitled to possession. The answer denies the material allegations of the complaint, pleads a counterclaim for damages arising out of the alleged trespass by the plaintiffs upon the defendants’ property, and then *573pleads as an affirmative defense that the lands occupied by the plaintiffs or a portion thereof upon which the trespass by the defendants is alleged to have occurred consists of filled in lands, title to which is in. the State of New York. This…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. . LawsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Beardslee v. New Berlin Light & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Oatka Cemetery Ass'n v. CazeauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  4. Delamater v. FolzNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Steinfeld v. MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. MunafoNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Wachter v. DostertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API