Legal Opinion

Clinton Mining & Mineral Co. v. Beacom

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 30, 1920No. 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

At Raw. Action by the Clinton Mining & Mineral Company against J. S. Beacom. On motion by plaintiff to take off compulsory nonsuit.

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSON, District Judge.

This is a motion to take off a judgment of compulsory nonsuit. The plaintiff, a corporation of the state of Iowa, recovered a judgment in an action of tort against the Imperial Gold Mining & Milling Company, a corporation of the state of South Dakota. The judgment being unpaid, the plaintiff brought this action against the defendant as a stockholder of the Imperial Company, to recover for an alleged balance unpaid upon his stock. *229The action is brought under section 441 oí the Civil Code of South Dakota, which is as follows:

“Uadi slock holder of a corporation is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whitney Arms Co. v. . BarlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Hancock National Bank v. FarnumSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Whitman v. Oxford National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Miller v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Chase v. CurtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gilman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  2. Klein v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  3. Clinton Mining & Mineral Co. v. BeacomCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1920
  4. Jerry T. Beech Concrete Contractor, Inc. v. Larry Powell Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API