Legal Opinion

Williams v. Clark

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 28, 1891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by defendant Frank W. Clark (impleaded with George W. Clark) from a judgment of the district court for Aitkin county, where the action was tried by Holland, J.

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

In- January, 1889, in proceedings under our insolvent law, the plaintiff was appointed receiver of the property of George W. Clark, an insolvent debtor. He prosecutes this action to avoid a conveyance of certain real estate made by the insolvent by deed to the defendant Frank W. Clark, December 24, 1888. The only facts alleged as the ground for the relief sought are that the conveyance was made in payment of a pre-existing indebtedness of the grantor to the grantee, evidenced by promissory notes theretofore.given, the grantor being insolvent, and the grantee having reasonable cause to believe…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chickering & Sons v. WhiteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DennyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Murray v. BealUtah Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Nicholson v. SchmuckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  4. Smith v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Putnam v. Hamilton-Stoddard-McCormickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API