Legal Opinion
Acheson v. Shepard
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 5, 2002PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiffs were entitled to the automatic restoration of the action to the trial calendar upon their timely initial request (see Basetti v Nour, 287 AD2d 126; see also Polvino v Island Group Admin., 289 AD2d 315; Anderson v Maltz, 288 AD2d 334; Wasilewicz v Village of Monroe Police Dept., 288 AD2d 377). Santucci, J.P., Smith, Krausman, H. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Basetti v. NourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Wasilewicz v. Village of Monroe Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Polvino v. Island Group Administration, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Anderson v. MaltzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by8 opinions
- Maragos v. Getty Petroleum Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Brannigan v. Board of Education of Levittown Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Small v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Lyons v. DonnellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- DiPietro v. ShenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.