Legal Opinion

Memphis A. Phillip Randolph Institute v. Hargett

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided February 25, 2022No. 3:20-cv-00374Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION MEMPHIS A. PHILLIP RANDOLPH ) INSTITUTE, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) NO. 3:20-cv-00374 ) v. ) JUDGE RICHARDSON ) TRE HARGETT, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from the Magistrate Judge recommending that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Doc. No. 158, “Motion”) be granted. (Doc. No. 166, “R&R”). Via the Motion, Plaintiffs seek, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988, an attorney’s fee award in the amount of $99,222.13. (Doc. No. 158…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Miller v. CurrieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  3. Ashraf v. Adventist Health Sys./Sunbelt, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2018
  4. Sole v. WynerSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Sanford J. Berger v. City of Mayfield HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API