Legal Opinion

Steel v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 16, 2003No. 02-72678PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Mark and Connie Steel and Odd-Bjorn and Lisa Huse appeal from the Tax Court’s affirmation of Commissioner’s deficiency determination. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a), and we affirm.

The Tax Court’s finding that the lawsuit proceeds were not part of the purchase price of BFI’s stock is not clearly erroneous. See Boehm v. Comm’r, 326 U.S. 287, 293, 66 S.Ct. 120, 90 L.Ed. 78 (1945); In re Steen, 509 F.2d 1398, 1402 (9th Cir.1975). As the requirement for capital gains treatment was not met, the proceeds are correctly taxed as ordinary income. See West v. Comm’r,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boehm v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. In the Matter of Charles A. Steen, Debtor. Dick Dimond, Trustee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Brian L. Nahey and Carol J. Nahey v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Pacific Transport Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  5. West v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eckersley v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API