Legal Opinion
Greer ex rel. Greer v. Rome City School District
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided December 26, 1991No. 90-9140PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Senior Circuit Judge:
Christy Greer is a handicapped child. She brought this action, through her father, against her local school district contending that it had failed to comply with the Education of the Handicapped Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1485 (now known as the “Individuals with Disabilities Education Act” pursuant to an amendment effective October 1,1990).1 The Greers contend that the Individualized Education Program (IEP) prepared by the school district for Christy is inappropriate because it provides for her placement in a self-contained special education class at a school other…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. BodingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Greer v. Rome City School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Percy Claybourn v. John SummervilleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994