Legal Opinion
Mackel v. Rochester
District Court, D. Montana
Decided March 13, 1905No. 13PublishedCited by 8 opinions
At Law. On motion for stay of proceedings.
1Opinion of the Court
HUNT, District Judge.
On April 3, 1899, the plaintiff, as trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of F. A. Bartlett, a bankrupt, brought this action in this court against the defendant, Rochester, to recover judgment for $8,563 and interest. Plaintiff alleges that on February 4, 1899, the said Bartlett then being insolvent and having been insolvent for a long time prior thereto, and then contemplating the filing of a petition in bankruptcy, fraudulently sold and transferred to the defendant, Rochester, a large stock of merchandise, which was all the property owned by Bartlett not exempt from…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crawford v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Forsyth v. VehmeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Ames v. MoirSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Mackel v. RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. GolomboskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- United States Credit Bureau, Inc. v. ManningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Karger v. OrthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Strauch v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Brandt v. KlementCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.