Legal Opinion

Barry v. Lauck

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1868PublishedCited by 6 opinions

FROM SUMNER. This cause -was heard hy Chancellor John P. Steele, of the Third Division, at a Special Term, in July, 1868, •who pronounced a decree in the cause; from which James E. Lauck, appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

This is a petition in Chancery, filed under the provisions of sec. 900, of the Code, for the purpose of testing the validity of an election held in the Seventh Chancery Division of this State, and under which the defendant, Lauck, claims to have been elected to the office of Chancellor of said Division.

The petitioner, Barry, was appointed by the Governor of this State, to fill a vacancy existing in the office of Chancellor of that Division, until his success- or should be chosen and qualified — his commission taking effect on the 11th day of September, 1865. On *590the 21st of February, 1868, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Williams v. CicottMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Attorney General v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Forbes v. BellTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State Ex Rel. Inman v. BrockTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Stuart v. Anderson County Election CommissionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
  4. Kenneth T. Whalum, Jr. v. Shelby County Election CommissionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
  5. Mike Parsons v. Jeff HuffmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API