Legal Opinion

Veglia v. Guidice

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 19, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages based upon fraudulent representations in connection with the purchase of a business, its fixtures and equipment, judgment in plaintiff’s favor, after trial by the court, without a jury, unanimously affirmed, with costs. In our opinion the proof sustains the finding that the loss of the business so purchased was the result of appellants’ misrepresentations and that respondent is entitled to recover the prospective profits thereof during the remainder of the term of the lease which appellants sold to him. (Snow V. Pulitzer, 142 N. Y. 263; Bagley v. Smith, 10 N.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bagley v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  2. Schile v. . BrokhahusNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Snow v. . PulitzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lev v. Aamco Automatic Transmissions, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1968
  2. Rennie v. Pierce Cards, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API