Legal Opinion

Mann v. Buford

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 2003No. 2001-IA-01699-SCTPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLER, Justice,

for the court.

¶ 1. After his complaint for partition and claim of heirship were dismissed, James Arthur Mann filed this interlocutory appeal which we allowed. See M.R.A.P. 5. James, the alleged illegitimate son and heir of William Henry Mann, had filed the complaint seeking a portion of the property left by William to his two adopted daughters, Jackie Buford and Jill Mann. Because James did not raise his claim of heirship until eighteen years after William’s death, we affirm the chancellor’s dismissal of the petition for partition and of James’ claim of heirship.

FACTS

¶ 2.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harrison County v. City of GulfportMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Cummings v. BendermanMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Bank of Mississippi v. HollingsworthMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Robinson v. CobbMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Morgan v. WestMississippi Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of McCullough v. YatesMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Arlean Morant Leach v. Geraldine YatesMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Estate of McCullough v. YatesMississippi Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API