Legal Opinion

Tatum v. Smith

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1930No. 28800PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The appellee exhibited an original bill against appellant, alleging that she was the owner of a certain lot in the town of Shaw, and that the appellant was claiming title thereto under a void tax sale, and prays for a cancellation of the appellant’s tax deed, as a cloud on the appellee’s title.

The appellant filed an answer and cross-bill. A demurrer to the cross-bill was sustained. The case was then heard on bill', answer, and agreed statement of facts, and a decree was rendered canceling the appellant’s tax deed.

In September, 1926, the state tax commission directed the board of supervisors…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Edward Hines Yellow Pine Trustees v. State Ex Rel. KnoxMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Robertson v. First National BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. JONES CTY. BD. OF SUPERVISORSMississippi Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Richton Tie & Timber Co. v. McWilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Durrant Inc. and Bennett Hills Inc. v. Lee County, Mississippi, Lee County Chancery Clerk, Lee County Tax Assessor, Lee County Tax Collector, State of Mississippi, Raptor Hotel LLC, and Comerica Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API