Schultz v. Erie Insurance Group
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
Appellant-plaintiff Carol Schultz appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee-defendant Erie Insurance Group ("Erie"). 1 She contends that the term "faulty workmanship" in her insurance policy is ambiguous and, therefore, her claims should go before a jury. Schultz also maintains that, even if the term is unambiguous, some of her damages resulted from sources other than "faulty workmanship" and are covered by her insurance policy. Finally, Schultz argues that Erie failed to show that "another excluded peril" contributed to her loss.
FACTS
The facts most…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- McDonald v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- Colonial Penn Insurance v. GuzorekIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Home Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Sheehan Construction Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Carlisle v. Deere & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Frank Coluccio Construction Co. v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Fourth Street Place, LLC v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Burlington v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.