Legal Opinion

Amado v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 8, 1990No. 87-01859PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHEB, Acting Chief Judge.

The defendant, Ernesto Amado, raises four points in appealing his convictions and sentences for trafficking in and delivery of cocaine. We reject his contentions that the court erred in admitting hearsay statements of coconspirators and in failing to instruct the jury on a lesser included offense. We agree that the court erred in convicting him of both trafficking and delivery of the same quantity of cocaine and *737in imposing a departure sentence because of the quantity of cocaine involved.

The Facts

The state charged the defendant with trafficking in cocaine and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  3. Shull v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  4. Wilcott v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  5. State v. DaophinSupreme Court of Florida · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Amado v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. State v. DuarteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API