State v. Folstrom
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
TODD, Justice.
Robert Folstrom, a Chippewa Indian, was convicted of possession of a pistol without a permit in violation of Minn.Stat. § 624.714 (1982), a Minnesota criminal statute. At the time of the arrest, Folstrom was on Indian trust property adjacent to reservation property. Folstrom claims he was using the pistol for deer hunting. He further claims that the State of Minnesota has no subject matter jurisdiction under the facts of this case. We affirm.
The facts are stipulated and provide as follows:
1. Robert Folstrom, the Defendant, is an enrolled member of the White Earth Band of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bryan v. Itasca CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Seminole Tribe Of Florida v. ButterworthCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- State v. PaigeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Application of AtkinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. TimberlakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. PoupardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. St. ClairCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. RoyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.