Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Sikes

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 9, 2005No. 04-30189PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion Dec. 6, 2004, 5 Cir., 2004, 392 F.3d 782)

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT and PRADO, Circuit Judges.1 BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. *324The Clerk will…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burgess v. SikesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bracewell v. Kelley (In Re Bracewell)District Court, M.D. Georgia · 2005
  2. Burgess v. SikesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  3. Burgess v. SikesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  4. Burgess v. SikesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API