Hoffine v. Ewings
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Otoe county. Tried below before Fawcett, J.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
As presented to us, a proper disposition of this action hinges upon the correctness of certain instructions given to the jury and excepted to, and the ruling of the trial court on a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence. The action is one of ejectment. The land in controversy is known as accretions caused by the recession of the channel of the Missouri river, on the borders of which the land lies. The plaintiff claims as the legal holder and owner of the title to the land to which the land in controversy is an alleged accretion, as aforesaid. The defendant claims…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Allen v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Pease v. LawsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
- Davenport v. SebringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Headrick v. FrittsTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ohm v. Clear Creek Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- Gates v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
- Wiegand v. Lincoln Traction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- Maxson v. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908
- Herbage v. McKeeNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.