Legal Opinion

First State Bank, Belmond v. Kalkwarf

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 26, 1993No. 91-1140PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

A mortgage foreclosure proceeding became a priority dispute between a bank lender and a judgment creditor of the borrower. The bank appeals and the judgment creditor cross-appeals from the trial court’s resolution of the dispute. We affirm on both appeals.

The crucial background facts were carefully detailed by the trial court in its ruling. In the following paragraphs, with minor editorial changes, we adopt those findings as our own.

Loren and Alberta Kalkwarf, husband and wife, are farmers. The First State Bank of Belmond (the bank) is a bank in a small rural community. Loren…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rouse v. RouseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  2. National Bank of Waterloo v. MoellerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  3. Production Credit Ass'n of the Midlands v. ShirleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  4. Van Dusseldorp v. State Bank of BusseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1986

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Benson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  2. Hatcher v. U.S. Trustee (In Re Hatcher)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  3. Hartford-Carlisle Savings Bank v. ShiversCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1996
  4. Garton v. GartonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  5. Blue Grass Savings Bank v. Community Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API