Legal Opinion

Equitable Trust Co. v. Proctor

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided May 28, 1943PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pearson, Vice-Chancellor:

The trustee asks instructions concerning the effect of a renunciation by the testatrix’ husband, Ernest William Proctor, of his rights under the will. The children of the testatrix contend that the husband’s renunciation of the right to trust income during his life accelerated their succeeding beneficial interests. On behalf of the grandchildren, this contention is opposed.

Mrs. Proctor died in April, 1942. Her will was probated later in the same month. She gave her residuary es- • tote to Equitable Trust Company, in trust. The terms of the trust which are concerned in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Disston's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  2. Roe v. DoeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1914
  3. Shepard v. BurrCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1913

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Aberg v. First National Bank in DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  2. Lewes Trust Co. v. SmithCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1944
  3. Welch v. WelchCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1969
  4. Auerbach v. SamuelsUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Union Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. EasterbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API