Legal Opinion · Dissent

Thomasson v. Thomasson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1988Published

1DissentDrowota, Justice

I respectfully dissent. Both parties having made out grounds for divorce, and neither party having made out a defense, I would grant the divorce to both parties.

I

Under prior case law, when both parties proved grounds for divorce, neither party was entitled to a divorce. Brewies v. Brewies, 27 Tenn.App. 68, 178 S.W.2d 84 (1943). Divorce was seen as “a remedy for the innocent against the guilty; hence, if both parties are equally at fault, a divorce will not be granted.” Id. 27 Tenn.App. at 72, 178 S.W.2d at 85. See also Brown v. Brown, 198 Tenn. 600, 281 S.W.2d 492 (1955); Canning v. Canning,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Orr v. OrrSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Brown v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Brown v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Lingner v. LingnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Williams v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API