Legal Opinion
Outlaw Laboratory, LP v. DG in PB, LLC
District Court, S.D. California
Decided December 23, 2020No. 3:18-cv-00840Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IN RE OUTLAW LABORATORIES, LP Case No.: 18-cv-840-GPC-BGS LITIGATION 12 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 13 SANCTIONS 14 [ECF No. 300] 15 16 17 On October 1, 2020, the Stores filed a Motion for Sanctions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 18 § 1927 (“Section 1927”) and the Court’s inherent powers. ECF No. 300. Tauler Smith 19 filed its Response on November 2, 2020. ECF No. 329. On November 16, 2020, the 20 Stores filed a Reply. ECF No. 332. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is 21 DENIED. 22 I. BACKGROUND 23 The parties…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- B.K.B., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Maui Police Department, County of Maui, County of Maui, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- David M. Fink v. James H. Gomez, Director, Diana Carloni NourseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- PRIMUS AUTOMOTIVE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rudolph A. BATARSE, Defendant, Jan C. Nielsen, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.