Legal Opinion

Mas v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 27, 1945No. 8954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDGERTON, Associate Justice.

Appellant was convicted on several counts of an indictment. One count charges that in an interference proceeding in the United States Patent Office, appellant filed certain false, fraudulent and fictitious statements. This charge is within § 35(A) of the Criminal Code, 18 U.S.C.A. § 80, 52 Stat. 197, which prohibits making such statements “in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States.” Appellant’s attack upon the count involves immaterial distinctions between the Patent Office and the Commissioner of Patents or between…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Milton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. United States v. BoyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  3. McCurley v. National Savings & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1919
  4. Read v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mas v. Coca-Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  2. United States v. Lawrence A. Crisafi and Frank GuglielminiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  3. Mas v. Coca Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API