Legal Opinion

United States v. Roosevelt Scarborough, Jr., United States of America v. Jose Dixon

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 4, 1971No. 24430, 24431PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MacKINNON, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Scarborough here questions the impeachment of one of his alibi witnesses through the use of a prior forgery conviction. 1 The witness secured her final release from probation approximately ten years and four months prior to the date the past conviction was used to impeach her testimony. At the time of the trial, there was no time limit, statutory or otherwise, on the use of prior convictions for such purposes and the admissibility of the evidence was within the sound discretion of the trial judge. Luck v. United States, 121 U.S.App.D.C. 151, 348 F.2d 763…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Charles M. Luck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  3. Hawk v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Lowell Lyons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  5. Gregory A. Davis v. United States of America, Leroy Johnson v. United States of America, Alphonzo M. Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HackettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  2. State v. HackettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API