Dyer v. Hobert

The appellee was plaintiff in the court below, and brought suit against the appellant for injury to her automobile; inflicted by a truck operated by the appellant in his business. The principal assignment of error goes to the insufficiency of evidence to sustain a verdict. The testimony is brief upon this point, and we quote therefrom as follows:

“Q. What damages was done to your daughter’s car1? A. The cost of the repairs to the car was seventy-two dollars and twenty-five cents.

“Q. What was the condition of this car before the wreck? A. First-class shape.

“Q:. What did you pay for the car?…